Tuesday, October 1, 2013

SRP-6: Background Research Paper – Rough Draft

Empathy, Abuse, and the Brain
Ceileigh Trevers
Alexia Grant
8th Grade Physical Science
Mr. Oz’s Class
SSA-DM
September 29, 2013











Though both genders have emotions and feelings just like any other human being, research shows that females have more feelings than men. “Women are better at describing in a complex way emotional reactions they would have to different life situations compared to men” (Barret et al., 2000). It is scientifically proven that women are more emotional than men.
Abuse comes in many different forms. These different forms include physical, mental and emotional abuse. “Abuse and violence normally start with emotional, mental and/or verbal abuse and can eventually escalate to things like physical, sexual and maybe even economic abuse.” (Utsey, F, 2002) Abuse, a horrible occurrence, happens to many different people, anywhere and everywhere.                                  
Domestic abuse, also known as spousal abuse, occurs when one person in a relationship or marriage tries to take control of the other person. Domestic abuse also includes physical violence, also called domestic violence. Domestic violence and abuse are used for one purpose and one purpose only: to gain and maintain total control over another person. ‘An abuser doesn’t “play fair.”’ (Carlson, Neil, 2006). Abusers use fear, guilt, shame, and intimidation to wear an object down.
People with emotional problems may beat, shoot, stab animals, or set them on fire. Those who abuse animals are very likely to be violent to other people. Neglect is not giving an animal the right food, water, shelter or care.
All U.S. states have animal cruelty laws, and 47 states treat some forms of abuse as felonies. Farmers and researchers can do cruel things to animals that other people can't do legally, but all states have some protection for pets like dogs and cats. Studies show that people feel more pity towards abused infants. I think this is because more than half the people in the world have or had children and could not imagine anything as horrible or terrifying as abuse happening to their kids.
When you hear a story about someone getting hurt, whether it is from abuse or a tragic accident, how does it make you feel? Whatever you might reply with, you would be referring to a feeling, commonly known as an emotion. Emotions are something you experience everyday. The word has many different meanings, but a generic one would be anything that prompts an automatic reaction within an organism that has been adapted for survival. Emotions come from the brain, specifically places like the Hypothalamus and Amygdala.  
Located just above the brainstem, “[The] Hypothalamus is very vital to both emotion and motivation, thus it is called “the brain within the brain". It is an important brain structure, which through its connections with autonomic nervous system controls glands and smooth muscles, blood vessels and the heart. It influences various kinds of emotional responses accompanied by physiological arousal.”
Though very small, the Amygdala, another emotion-controlling part of the brain, has a very big job. “This almond sized organ is responsible for determining what is danger to us, what we allow to get close to us, and this also includes other people. It keeps record of how we may have been hurt in the past, and it causes us to react in the same way every time the situation comes up again. It also remembers anything that is a threat to us. This is what it is designed to do until it gets damaged and twisted. We need this detection device and that is the job of the Amygdala, but if it gets wrong information, as in abuse or with other lies, then it can't perform correctly anymore and it causes fear and trauma which can result in mental deficiencies.” (Gamble, 2012)
Some common emotions that can originate from hearing abuse stories include sympathy and empathy. Even though they sound the same, these emotions are not alike in concept or definition.
If someone has asked you to “put yourself in their shoes” when referring to someone, they are basically asking you to be empathetic. In definition, empathy is the recognition and understanding of someone’s problem or situation. Empathy is not only an emotion, but it is also a feeling that everyone can have. Empathy is basically like human nature; it is a psychological feeling, which relates to the human mind. By feeling empathy you are showing others that you are prosocial, or a positive person. Empathy not only shows people that a person has feelings, but it also helps progressive construction or the advancing of a personality.  
On the other hand, sympathy (also known as pity) most commonly results from a positive response to someone’s suffering. When being sympathetic, you don’t know how the person feels. You cannot relate to or understand their situation or how they are feeling because it has not happened to you before.
Believe or not, it is possible to rate empathy. “A large chunk of empathy research has focused on investigating the variables associated with empathy as a stable disposition... some of the most widely used questionnaires have been Hogan's empathy (EM) scale (Hogan 1969), Mehrabian and Epstein's questionnaire measure of emotional empathy (QMEE; Mehrabian and Epstein 1972), and, since the 1980's, Davis's Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis 1980, 1983, and 1994). [They] reflect the multiplicity of empathy conceptions in psychology, since each understands itself as operationalizing a different definition of empathy. Hogan conceives of empathy in an exclusively cognitive manner, Mehrabian and Epstein think of it as an exclusively affective phenomenon defining it broadly as “a vicarious response to the perceived emotional experiences of others” (525), and Davis treats empathy as including both cognitive and affective components; as a “set of constructs, related in that they all concern responsivity to others but are also clearly discriminable from each other” (Davis 1983, 113).” (Steuber, 2013) These surveys, along with others, have been used throughout many scientific studies. For example a researcher, Sara Konrath and her colleague, Edward O’Brien did a study concerning the empathy levels of college students. According to their data, the empathy levels of college students towards people in their 20s and 30s have been dropping. Konrath and O’Brien suggest that the influx of social media exposure might be the cause of this decrease.





















Cited Sources
1) Gholipour, B. (2013, September 13). Woman experiences 'hyper empathy’ after brain surgery. Retrieved from http://www.mnn.com/health/fitness-well-being/stories/woman-experiences-hyper-empathy-after-brain-surgery


2) Simon-Thomas, E. (2007). Are women more empathetic than men?. Retrieved from http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/women_more_empathic_than_men


3) Mather, M., Canli, T., English, T., Whitfield, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., John, D. E. G., & L. Carstensen, L. (2004). Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults.Psychological Science, 15(4), 259-263. Retrieved from http://pss.sagepub.com/content/15/4/259.short


4) Rettner, R. (2013, August 10). Abused puppies get more sympathy than adult crime victims. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/38800-abused-puppies-sympathy-adult-victims.html?


5) Gender and emotions- the dynamics of emotion. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/psychology/emotions/the-dynamics-of-emotion/gender-and-emotions/


7) Empathy. (2013). Retrieved from


8) Emotion. (2013). Retrieved from
9) Gamble, L. (2010, February 09). The amygdala and how it affects emotions. Retrieved from http://voices.yahoo.com/the-amygdala-affects-emotions-5403251.html
10) Stueber, K. (2013). Retrieved from
11) Solomon, R. Emotions. New Dictionary of the History of Ideas. 2005.   Encyclopedia.com. (15 Sep. 2013) Retrieved from
12) Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. . Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ose5vtvDoBoC&oi=fnd&pg

13) Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (2009). The neuroscience of empathy. (pp. 1-22). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=KLvJKTN_nDoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=empathy&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lgY2UuutDa60igKvhoGwCQ&ved=0CF0Q6AEwCQ

14) Widl . Empathy. International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. (September 15, 2013). Retrieved from
15) Sympathy. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 2008. Encyclopedia.com. (15 Sep. 2013) retrieved from
16) Neil R.Carlson, C.Donald Heth. "Psychology: The Science of Behaviour", New York Publish Company, 2001 ,pg 562

Monday, September 23, 2013

SRP - 5 Background Research Paper – Outline (Plan)


Keywords-

  • genders
  • pity
  • abuse
  • sympathy
  • emotion

Research Questions-

  • Why do we feel emotions?
  • How does one measure sympathy and/or pity?
  • Who is most affected by stories about abuse?
  • What part of the brain recognizes and receives emotions?
  • What are some emotional disorders, and what causes them? 
  • When studying emotions, do scientists use research labs?
  • Where (in the brain) do emotions come from?
  • Where, in the world, are abuse cases (involving pets, children, or adults) reported most? 

Science Concepts and/or Ideas of Science-

  • Hypothalamus 
  • Amygdala
  • Prefrontal Cortex, 
  • Anterior Cingulate, 
  • Ventral Striatum,
  • Insula

Sunday, September 15, 2013

SRP-4 Sources

So, we're moving into stage 2 of our SRPs! (Stage 1 was the current events and the finding of our topic.) Stage 1 project 4 is where we have to find our sources, 5 encyclopedia/dictionary/book articles and 5 web pages or experiments. Of course, all of them have to involve and/or give us background information about our research topic. Below are the links for the background info I found, along with what Ceileigh found:

Web Pages/ Experimental Articles
1) Gholipour, B. (2013, September 13). Woman experiences 'hyper empathy’ after brain surgery. Retrieved from http://www.mnn.com/health/fitness-well-being/stories/woman-experiences-hyper-empathy-after-brain-surgery


2) Simon-Thomas, E. (2007). Are women more empathetic than men?. Retrieved from http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/women_more_empathic_than_men


3) Mather, M., Canli, T., English, T., Whitfield, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., John, D. E. G., & L. Carstensen, L. (2004). Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults.Psychological Science, 15(4), 259-263. Retrieved from http://pss.sagepub.com/content/15/4/259.short


4) Rettner, R. (2013, August 10). Abused puppies get more sympathy than adult crime victims. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/38800-abused-puppies-sympathy-adult-victims.html?


5) Gender and emotions- the dynamics of emotion. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/psychology/emotions/the-dynamics-of-emotion/gender-and-emotions/



Encyclopedia Articles/Books
6) Solomon, Robert. Emotions. New Dictionary of the History of Ideas. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. (15 Sep. 2013) http://www.encyclopedia.com


7) Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. . Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ose5vtvDoBoC&oi=fnd&pg

8) Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (2009). The neuroscience of empathy. (pp. 1-22). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=KLvJKTN_nDoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=empathy&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lgY2UuutDa60igKvhoGwCQ&ved=0CF0Q6AEwCQ

9) Widl . Empathy. International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. (September 15, 2013). http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3435300440.html



10) Sympathy. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 2008. Encyclopedia.com. (15 Sep. 2013) retrieved from http://www.encyclopedia.com

This is the link to the Google Doc with all the topics:

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Final Science Fair Question

And now, the moment you have been waiting for...(insert drum roll...)

My final research question! After a lot of thinking with my science fair partner, we have decided to do question number one of my 3 choices. Just in case you don't feel like scrolling down and reading the entry below, the question is, "Does gender affect the level of sympathy a person has? Again, you can also check out my partner, Ceileigh's blog at watermarkscience.blogspot.com.

*Revision (Sept. 13, 2013) With help from our teacher, Ceileigh and I have come up with a more specific science fair question for the project. The final question is now, "Do different genders overall have more feelings of pity for an abused baby, an abused puppy, or an elderly person?"

Saturday, September 7, 2013

SRP Research Questions

My first question is "Does gender affect the level of sympathy a person has?". I've always wondered if females have the capacity to feel more sympathetic emotions than males. After reading an article, Abused Puppies Get More Sympathy Than Adult Crime Victims on testing empathy in people for my fourth current event, I began to wonder about how gender affects emotion even more.  I can test this question using adults or children, male and female, all the same age. If I used my school as a resource for people, this question would be repeatable because of all the different classes we have. I believe I should get to do this question because learning about human emotions is something I am passionate about. It would also provide background information if I were to do my second research question for another science fair project. 

My second question is  "Does age affect how sensitive you are to emotion?". Based on an abstract I read for my third current event, The Brain Basis of Emotion: An Analytic Review, I want to know if your emotions get stronger or weaker as you age. This question is testable, and repeatable. I would be using people as the test subjects, so I can use friends from school parents' co-workers, etc. I also do believe this question is concise. I should get to do this project because it ties into my first research question, but it's different, so I'm not doing the same project. 

My final research question is "Does talking to yourself actually make you smarter?". I read an article for my first current event called Talking Yourself Makes You Smarter, in which researchers did an interesting experiment to prove this question true. Even though the scientists that conducted the experiments are trained professors, I want to see if I can recreate, or even expand this project myself. Again, using a school environment, this question would be testable and repeatable. I think i should get to do this project because I feel that I could add some originality to the experiments, and I'm the question would open up different possibilities for background research.


Aside from these 3 questions, there's a question that Ceileigh (http://watermarkscience.blogspot.com/), my soon-to-be science fair partner came up with, which is "Are people actually more beautiful than they perceive?" You can check out her blog for more info. Either my first or her second question will be what our project is about. 

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Science Current Event No. 4: Abused Puppies Get More Sympathy Than Adult Crime Victims

Abused Puppies Get More Sympathy Than Adult Crime Victims


Two puppies lay down next to each other.
Puppies may be better at garnering empathy than people are, in some cases, a new study finds.
Credit: Puppies photo via Shutterstock
People have more empathy for abused puppies and dogs than they do for adult humans who have been abused, a new study suggests.
However, empathy for abused children was about the same as that for puppies and dogs, the study found.
Researchers surveyed 240 college students and asked them to read one of four versions of a fictional news article about a brutal beating. The wording in articles was the same, except for the identity of the victim, which was either: an infant, an adult in his 30s, a puppy or a 6-year old dog. Participants then rated their level of empathy for the victim.

Participants had higher levels of empathy for the abused child, puppy and dog than they did for the abused adult, the study found. [See 7 Surprising Health Benefits of Dog Ownership]
The researchers had hypothesized that younger victims would receive more empathy, regardless of species. Instead, they found "Age makes a difference for empathy toward human victims, but not for dog victims," the researchers wrote in their study abstract, which will be presented this week at the American Sociological Association meeting in New York.
"The fact that adult human crime victims receive less empathy than do child, puppy, and full-grown dog victims suggests that adult dogs are regarded as dependent and vulnerable, not unlike their younger canine counterparts and kids," study researcher Jack Levin, a sociology and criminology professor at Northeastern University in Boston, said in a statement.
"It appears that adult humans are viewed as capable of protecting themselves, while full-grown dogs are just seen as larger puppies," Levin said.
The researchers said they suspect they would find similar results if they looked at empathy levels for other abused pets, such as cats. "These are animals to which many individuals attribute human characteristics," Levin said.
Women in the study were more empathetic than men towards human and animal victims. Studies show that women are generally more empathetic than men, Levin said. "The reason may be partially biological, given the role of females in childbirth and childrearing activities," he said.
Because the new study involved only college-age students, it's not clear if the results apply to people who are significantly older or younger.
Follow Rachael Rettner @RachaelRettner. FollowLiveScience @livescience, Facebook Google+. Original article on LiveScience.com .

Summary & Highlighter Key: 
Green: Conclusion
Blue: Purpose
Yellow: Procedure
Pink: Results
Orange: Hypothesis  

If you watch the news, you might hear a story about animal abuse. At the same, you might hear a story about a person getting mugged or hurt. A new study shows that the common population is more likely to be empathetic towards an abused dog, rather than an injured person of their own species. Researchers hypothesized that younger victims, whether animal or human, would receive more empathy. Then, experiments were conducted; 240 college students read a fictional article on someone getting abused. The victims varied between an infant, puppy, or 30 year old man. Levels of empathy were rated by students afterwards. The researchers' hypothesis was half right, according to the data;  empathetic emotions were affected by age, but only with humans. This data may show that dogs are seen about as vulnerable as an infant, no matter the age.
 Questions:
1) Does gender affect the level of empathy?
2) Does the animal species affect the level of empathy?
3) How can this project be expanded?
Source: 
Rettner, R. (2013, August 10). Abused puppies get more sympathy than adult crime victims . Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/38800-abused-puppies-sympathy-adult-victims.html?















Monday, August 26, 2013

Science Current Event No. 3: The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review

The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review

Kristen A. Lindquista1, Tor D. Wagera2, Hedy Kobera3, Eliza Bliss-Moreaua4 and Lisa Feldman Barretta5

a1 Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital/Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02129, and Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.lindqukr@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~lindqukr/
a2 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. tor.wager@colorado.edu http://www.psych.colorado.edu/~tor/
a3 Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519. hedy.kober@yale.eduhttp://medicine.yale.edu/psychiatry/people/hedy_kober.profile
a4 California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. eblissmoreau@ucdavis.eduhttp://www.elizablissmoreau.com/EBM/home.html
a5 Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, and Departments of Radiology and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital/Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02129.l.barrett@neu.edu http://www.affective-science.org/
Abstract
(Purpose) Researchers have wondered how the brain creates emotions since the early days of psychological science. With a surge of studies in affective neuroscience in recent decades, scientists are poised to answer this question. In this target article, we present a meta-analytic summary of the neuroimaging literature on human emotion. We compare the locationist approach (i.e., the hypothesis that discrete emotion categories consistently and specifically correspond to distinct brain regions) with the psychological constructionist approach (i.e., the hypothesis that discrete emotion categories are constructed of more general brain networks not specific to those categories) to better understand the brain basis of emotion. (Procedure) We review both locationist and psychological constructionist hypotheses of brain–emotion correspondence and report meta-analytic findings bearing on these hypotheses. (Results) Overall, we found little evidence that discrete emotion categories can be consistently and specifically localized to distinct brain regions. (Conclusion) Instead, we found evidence that is consistent with a psychological constructionist approach to the mind: A set of interacting brain regions commonly involved in basic psychological operations of both an emotional and non-emotional nature are active during emotion experience and perception across a range of discrete emotion categories.
Kristen A. Lindquist is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Harvard University Mind/Brain/Behavior Initiative and is affiliated with the Departments of Neurology (Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital) and Psychology (Harvard University). She received her A.B. in 2004 and her Ph.D. in 2010 from Boston College. Her interdisciplinary research uses social cognitive, psychophysiological, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging methods to understand how emotions emerge from the combination of more basic psychological operations.
Tor D. Wager is the director of the Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Laboratory at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He received his Ph.D. in cognitive psychology, with a focus in cognitive neuroscience, from the University of Michigan in 2003. He joined the faculty of Columbia University as an Assistant Professor of Psychology in 2004, and was appointed Associate Professor in 2009. In 2010, he joined the faculty of the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Colorado, Boulder. His research focuses on how expectations shape responses to pain and emotional cues in the brain and body. Peer-reviewed publications include work on brain mechanisms of placebo analgesia and the cognitive regulation of emotion and attention.
Hedy Kober is an Assistant Professor in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Cognitive Science at Yale University and Director of the Clinical and Affective Neuroscience Laboratory and Director of Research at Yale's Therapeutic Neuroscience Clinic. She received her B.A., M.A., and M.Phil. in Psychology from Columbia University. She completed her Ph.D. in Psychology with a focus on Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience at Columbia University in 2009. Her research focuses on neural mechanisms of psychological change, regulation of craving, and regulation of emotion more generally.
Eliza Bliss-Moreau is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of California, Davis and the California National Primate Research Center. She received her S.B. in biology and psychology in 2002 and her Ph.D. in psychology in 2008 from Boston College. Her research focuses on the neurobiological and physiological underpinnings of individual differences in affect and emotion. She adopts a translational approach by modeling affective processing in both humans and nonhuman primates.
Lisa Feldman Barrett is Distinguished Professor of Psychology and Director of the Interdisciplinary Affective Science Laboratory (IASLab) at Northeastern University, with research appointments at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Barrett received her B.Sc. from the University of Toronto in 1986, and her Ph.D. in clinical psychology from the University of Waterloo in 1992. Her research focuses on the nature of emotion from both psychological and neuroscience perspectives, and takes inspiration from anthropology, philosophy, and linguistics. In 2007, she received a National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award for her research.




Summary: 

Definition of META-ANALYSIS

: a quantitative statistical analysis of several separate but similar experiments or studies in order to test the pooled data for statistical significance
Emotions are a huge part of our life; sometimes, it's hard to distinguish them, but they're there. Now, the question is "How does our brain create emotions?" Researchers are determined to find the answer. Two hypotheses were proposed: 1) certain emotions come from specific areas of the brain. 2) Emotions can come from a generalized area of the brain that aren't specific. The brain was then analyzed psychologically and location-wise, along with meta-analytic reports that proved either one or both of the hypotheses true.  The results showed that there was little evidence that proved the hypothesis of specific emotions coming from certain brain regions was valid, so the first hypothesis was wrong. However, data proved something different altogether: brain regions that have to do with the psychological, emotional, and non-emotional part of mind become actively linked when an emotional event occurs. 

Questions: What part of the brain controls emotions primarily? Does age affect how sensitive you are to emotion? Does gender affect how much you can distinguish your emotions? 

Source: 
Lindquist, K., Wager, T., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. June 2012, 121-143. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8593980